USPTO serial 88979921
BLACK SHARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6570280Status 780Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2021
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BLACK SHARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
Nanchang City, CN
Other trademarks owned by BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
Nanchang City, CN
Other trademarks owned by BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
Nanchang City, CN
Other trademarks owned by BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action figures; amusement machines, automatic and coin-operated; arcade video game machines; battery-powered computer game with LCD screen; board games; claw crane game machines; collectable toy figures; controllers for game consoles; dice; hand-held consoles for playing video games; home video game machines; modeled plastic toy figurines; playing card cases; playing pieces in the nature of miniature action figures and toy model vehicles for use with table top hobby battle games in the nature of battle, war and skirmish games, and fantasy games; portable games with liquid crystal displays; protective carrying cases specially adapted for handheld video games; protective films adapted for screens for portable games; role playing games; scale model kits; soft sculpture plush toys; soft sculpture toys; tables for table football; toy action figures; toy models; video game consoles; video game interactive control floor pads or mats; video game joysticks; video game machines | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by BLACKSHARK TECHNOLOGIES (Nanchang) CO., LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BLACK SHARK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2025 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 7, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |