USPTO serial 88979964
UTOPIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NODES, CHRISTOPHER JAMES
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UTOPIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. McLean
Paul A. McLean GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVE, 5TH FLOOREAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Venture capital services, namely, providing and facilitating venture capital, development capital, private equity and investment funding to new ventures and startup companies; Incubation services, namely, rental of office space to entrepreneurs, new ventures and startup companies for the development of design, technology, product development, and prototype manufacturing; Incubation services, namely, providing financing support to early stage startup companies; all of the foregoing relating to new ventures, urban solutions and startup companies that are focused on making cities better for the many, not just the few, and all of the foregoing to exclude actual real estate development and construction services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, events, seminars, workshops, and conferences in the field of urban communities, entrepreneurship, startups, new product design, development and testing, new product marketing, urban planning, all of the forgoing relating to new ventures, urban solutions and startup companies that are focused on making cities better for the many, not just the few | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Innovation consulting services in the nature of advising others in the areas of product development; design, development, and consulting services related thereto; all of the foregoing in the fields of product development innovation, new product design, computer technology, product development, technology product development, urban architecture, and urban planning, but excluding actual real estate development and construction services, all of the foregoing relating to new ventures, urban solutions and startup companies that are focused on making cities better for the many, not just the few | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2021 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |