USPTO serial 88981076
INVESTMENT CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OJEYEMI, ASHLEY CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INVESTMENT CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark G. Knedeisen
Mark G. Knedeisen K&L GATES LLP210 SIXTH AVENUEK&L GATES CENTERPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2613Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to facilitate, administer, and process payments; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for managing payment card accounts and performing contactless payment card transactions; encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used for authentication in financial transactions; electronic data carriers in the form of magnetically encoded payment cards for use in financial transactions; magnetically encoded payment cards for use in financial transactions; electronically encoded payment cards for use in financial transactions; payment cards, namely, encoded electronic chip cards for use in financial transactions; smart codes containing programmed used to store and protect cardholder data; computer software for transmitting, displaying and storing transaction, identification and financial information for use in the financial services and banking industries; computer software to enable smart cards, mobile phones and mobile devices to interact with terminals and card readers; computer software for transmitting, displaying and storing transactions, identifications and financial information for use in the financial services, banking and telecommunications industries; computer software for facilitating payment transactions by electronic means over wireless network, global computer networks and/or mobile telecommunications devices; downloadable software application for use in connection with contactless payment terminals for allowed merchants to accepts contactless mobile commercial transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, payment card transaction processing services; point of sale and point of transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a payment card at the point of sale; electronic payment processing services, namely, payment card transaction processing services; facilitating payment services through electronic means via a global computer network, namely, providing electronic processing of ACH and payment card transactions and electronic payments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |