USPTO serial 88981140
ARMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Todd Bates
R. Todd Bates HILBORNE HAWKIN & CO.230 COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 185IRVINE, CA 92602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Industrial oils and fats; Industrial lubricants; Dust absorbing compositions; Fuels; Lighting fuel; Candles; Wax melts; Crude oil; Combustible oil; Heating oil; All-purpose penetrating oil; Hardened oils being hydrogenated oils for industrial use; Industrial greases | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Natural rubber; Crude rubber; Synthetic rubber; Asbestos; Mica; Plastic in bars, blocks, pellets, rods, sheets and tubes in further manufacture for general industrial use; Sealing and insulating materials; Adhesive sealants for general use; Flexible pipes, not of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PT. ENERCO RPO INTERNASIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by PT. ENERCO RPO INTERNASIONAL
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named ARMAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |