USPTO serial 88981279
VINDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6405442Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2021
- Examiner
- MCCLELLAN, MATTHEW D.
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VINDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUCAS S MICHELS
LUCAS S MICHELS IRONMARK LAW GROUP PLLC215 NE 40TH STREETSUITE C-3SEATTLE, WA 98105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of consumer information in the field of motor vehicle history, namely, electronic transmission of information identifying problems with title, registration, previous accidents, previous owners, and other information affecting vehicle value, safety, and performance when given vehicle identification obtained via a keyboard, voice, camera or other means via the Internet or a wireless communication mechanism, and electronic transmission of consumer information in the fields of vehicle advertisements, vehicle warranties, vehicle insurance, and vehicle financing services for the purpose of comparison shopping, valuation, purchasing decisions, and lead generation | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2025 | NCS7 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 27, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |