USPTO serial 88981672
CANNDESCENT CALIFORNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 794
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALES, HEATHER ALISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANNDESCENT CALIFORNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA, US
SAN ANSELMO, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel L. Fintz
Nathaniel L. Fintz Zuber Lawler LLP260 Madison Avenue, Suite 8021New York, NY 10016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Essential oils, Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of essential oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicinal herbs in dried or preserved form, Medicinal herb extracts; Herbs for medicinal purposes, Orally-consumed medicinal herbs in dried or preserved form in the nature of dietary supplements; Orally-consumed medicinal herb extracts in the nature of dietary supplements, Orally-consumed herbs for medicinal purposes in the nature of dietary supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Dried herbs, Processed herbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Herbs for smoking, Electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty, Cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; Cartridges sold filled with vegetable glycerin for electronic cigarettes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Light Effect Apparel LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PROJECT NO. 33, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named CANNDESCENT CALIFORNIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 22, 2018 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |