USPTO serial 88982294
FIRST TO HASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2021
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FIRST TO HASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Staub
Matthew Staub Pasha Law PC302 Washington StreetSte. 150-6440San Diego, CA 92103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer application software, namely, software for time stamping and storing materials using blockchain technology | ACTIVE | May 8, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2021 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 4, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |