USPTO serial 88982810
ALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIFTU, BENIAM
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BEN NATTER
BEN NATTER HAUG PARTNERS, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to an interactive website for persons to participate in on-line social networking services; Provision of access to a web site featuring information on personal interests, hobbies and lifestyles; providing access to on-line computer databases and on-line searchable databases in the field of social networking | ACTIVE | May 5, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |