USPTO serial 88982850
HOSPITALITY SIMPLIFIED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2022
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with HOSPITALITY SIMPLIFIED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzan Canli
245 5TH STREET, NO. 107SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of serving hospitality businesses, namely, private clubs, hotels, for accepting and managing lodging, customer relations management, reciprocity arrangements, and for use by their guests to interact directly for guest services, namely, making lodging and dining reservations, booking spa services, responding to event announcements, and checking in | ACTIVE | Aug 25, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2022 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2022 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 12, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 11, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |