USPTO serial 88982942
DOG TALES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOG TALES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY V. STEPHENS
NANCY V. STEPHENS FOSTER GARVEY, PCSUITE 30001111 3RD AVENUESEATTLE, WA 98001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Pet food; Edible chews for animals; Edible pet treats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |