USPTO serial 88983008
YES CANNABIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YES CANNABIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Zuber
Thomas F. Zuber Zuber Lawler LLP350 S. Grand Ave., 32nd FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Dried herbs containing cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Dried herbs containing hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Dried herbs containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Dried herbs containing cannabichromene solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Dried herbs containing cannabicyclol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Dried herbs containing cannabitriol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Dried herbs containing lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, and no cannabis ingredients, and no more than trace amounts of cannabidiol; Processed herbs containing cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Processed herbs containing hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Processed herbs containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Processed herbs containing cannabichromene solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Processed herbs containing cannabicyclol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Processed herbs containing cannabitriol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Processed herbs containing lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, and no cannabis ingredients, and no more than trace amounts of cannabidiol; Candy containing cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Candy containing hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Candy containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Candy containing cannabichromene solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Candy containing cannabicyclol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Candy containing cannabitriol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Candy containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Candy containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta 9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Candy containing lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, and no cannabis ingredients, and no more than trace amounts of cannabidiol; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing cannabichromene solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing cannabicyclol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing cannabitriol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta 9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods containing lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, and no cannabis ingredients, and no more than trace amounts of cannabidiol; Chocolate containing cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Chocolate containing hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Chocolate containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Chocolate containing cannabichromene solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Chocolate containing cannabicyclol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Chocolate containing cannabitriol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Chocolate containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Chocolate containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta 9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Chocolate containing lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, and no cannabis ingredients, and no more than trace amounts of cannabidiol; Gum sweets containing cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Gum sweets containing hemp with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Gum sweets containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta 9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Gum sweets containing cannabichromene solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Gum sweets containing cannabicyclol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Gum sweets containing cannabitriol solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Gum sweets containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing no CBD; Gum sweets containing hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, all the foregoing products containing cannabis ingredients solely with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all the foregoing containing naturally-occurring trace levels of CBD solely derived from cannabis with a delta 9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Gum sweets containing lavender, mint, cardamom, ginger, myrrh, and spearmint, and no cannabis ingredients, and no more than trace amounts of cannabidiol | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |