USPTO serial 88983219
REV 'N ROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCLEIDOROVICH, JOANNA YAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REV 'N ROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY,, 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys and playthings; educational toys of all types, small and large play environments, ball games, rocket games, toy weapons, electronic toys, electronic toys that light up as nightlights, ride-on toys; games, namely, party games, role playing games, action skill games, target games and floor games, card games, board games, travel games, tooled plastic games, puzzles, board puzzles, foam puzzles, plastic puzzles, computer games not adapted for use with television receivers, dolls, balls, games, toys with music, dress-up clothes, plush toys, construction toys, action figures; summer toys, namely, pails, shovels, sand toys; bicycles, tricycles, skate boards, in-line skates, garden toys, backyard toys, playground slides, swing sets; winter toys, shovels, sleds, toboggans, magic carpets; water toys, namely, pool toys, floating toys, floatation devices and accessories, namely, floatation noodles and kickboard floatation devices for recreational use; bubble toys, spray toys, floatation devices and accessories; sprinklers, hose and nozzles, bath toys; bath tub toys; cooking/baking/kitchen kits, namely, toy bake ware and cookware; Christmas stockings; Christmas tree ornaments; baby rattles; baby multiple activity toys; baby swings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |