USPTO serial 88983240
Serial No. 88983240
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 88983240?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua L. Simmons
Joshua L. Simmons Kirkland & Ellis LLP601 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services and monitoring services, namely, monitoring and tracking networks, assets and software applications of others to provide strategy, insight, operation, particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of businesses, and market trends and actions; monitoring networks, data, assets and network-connected assets for business purposes; providing an on-line searchable database featuring business data and information; preparation of business reports; analyzing and compiling data for measuring the dynamic, deployed operational footprint and performance of industries and financial markets | ACTIVE | Oct 25, 2018 |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for data mining, connecting with internet protocol addresses, identifying internet protocol addresses, securing network operations, and identifying network security risks; providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for data mining, connecting with internet protocol addresses, identifying internet protocol addresses, securing network operations, and identifying network security risks; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for data mining, connecting with internet protocol addresses, identifying internet protocol addresses, securing network operations, and identifying network security risks; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for data mining, connecting with internet protocol addresses, identifying internet protocol addresses, securing network operations, and identifying network security risks; monitoring data, namely, monitoring of computer systems for detecting data associated with the configuration, operation, and behavior of networked computing systems and monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; application service provider featuring application programming interface (api) software for downloading internet intelligence information, edge tracking remediation statuses, and information about risks on enterprise network edges; computer services, namely, electronic digitizing of or visualization in the nature of communicating findings through graphical and other visual means, maps of internet connected assets and external facing protocols and services and mapping of data; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for use in data science, asset optimization, and optimization of infrastructure management and/or information security processes for information technology security, governance, and compliance; data mining; data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in connection with any one or more of the previously named services for information technology security, governance, and compliance; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in monitoring of computer systems to allow users to aggregate, model, and analyze data from their machines and infrastructure for security purposes; development, maintenance, repair, and configuration of software for machine learning; development, maintenance, repair, and configuration of software for forecasting, predicting, and monitoring system failures; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for providing descriptive analytics, diagnostic analytics, predictive analytics, prescriptive analytics and analytics against data, namely, computer systems analysis, computer systems security analysis, computer network security analysis, computer network management and optimization, information technology management and optimization; data security consultancy; computer security and information technology consultancy in the field of data collection, attack surface and vulnerability enumeration and remediation, and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability and IT operations; development of electronic reporting for others using computers or sensors of information technology assets, computer networking systems and appliances, and cloud computing platforms for use in risk assessment, information security, business analysis, audit and audit planning, and process management | ACTIVE | Oct 23, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 17, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |