USPTO serial 88983625
GOOD DAY CBD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 622
- Filing date
- —
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- UNKNOWN
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOOD DAY CBD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy L. Capria
Timothy L. Capria BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP1600 DIVISION STREET, SUITE 700NASHVILLE, TN, 37203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hemp or cannabinoid related products, namely, body oils, concentrated plant extracts distilled solely from hemp containing not more than 0.3 percent delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration by dry weight basis and sold as an integral component of nonmedicated skincare preparations, topical skin creams; essential oils; essential oils for personal use; essential oils for use in aromatherapy; aromatic essential oils; natural essential oils; aromatic oils; body cream; body cream including cbd; hand cream; hand cream including cbd; skin cream; skin cream including cbd; body lotion; body lotion including cbd; hand lotion; hand lotion including cbd; skin lotion; skin lotion including cbd; cosmetic oils; cosmetic oils including cbd; facial beauty masks; facial beauty masks including cbd; non-medicated facial mists; non-medicated facial mists including cbd; all of the foregoing goods being topical non-medicated goods containing cannabidiol (cbd) derived from hemp as defined in the federal 2018 farm bill and containing a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (thc) concentration of not greater than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; all of the foregoing goods in compliance with federal laws and rules | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |