USPTO serial 88983657
ARRIS COMPOSITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARRIS COMPOSITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tsan Abrahamson
Tsan Abrahamson Cobalt LLP1912 BONITA AVENUEBERKELEY, CA 94704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Composite materials consisting of a fibrous reinforcing structure made of carbon, glass, aramids being aromatic polyamide fibers, metal, ceramic, CNT being carbon nanotubes, polymers, and flax being a composite material made of polylactic acid and flax fiber, for use in manufacturing; Carbon composite materials consisting of a fibrous reinforcing structure made of carbon fibers and densified by a carbon matrix, for use in manufacturing; Engineered composite materials for heat transfer or thermal management applications in manufacturing; Polyacrylonitrile as raw materials and precursors in the nature of polymer base compositions for use in the manufacture of industrial products, namely, composite materials for 3d printing; raw materials and precursors, namely, polymer base compositions used in the manufacture of commercial and industrial goods; Polyacrylonitrile as raw materials and precursors in the nature of polymer compositions for use in manufacturing carbon fiber | ACTIVE | May 1, 2017 |
| 040 | Research in the field of manufacturing processes for products made from composite materials; Technical research and technical research consultancy in the field of automated manufacturing processes related to products made of fiber and plastic composite materials; technical research and technical research consultancy in the field of automated construction, namely, 3d printing, of products made of fiber and plastic composite materials; technical research and technical research consultancy in the field of automated additive manufacturing of products made of fiber and plastic composite materials | ACTIVE | May 1, 2017 |
| 042 | Research, development, and design of machinery for manufacturing products made from composite materials; Research, development, and design of manufacturing machine parts made from composite materials; Structural design engineering services related to products made of composite materials; new product design services related to products made of composite materials; Product development of manufacturing equipment products for use in the manufacture, inspection, and processing of products made of composite materials | ACTIVE | May 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arris Composites, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Arris Composites, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARRIS COMPOSITES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2022 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 30, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |