Drawing for GRANDEUR CBD

USPTO serial 88984100

GRANDEUR CBD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRANDEUR CBD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James David Johnson

James David Johnson JOHNSON & MARTIN, P.A.500 WEST CYPRESS CREEK ROADSUITE 430FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Plant and herb extracts sold as components of cosmetics; plant extracts for use in the manufacture of non-medicinal and non-therapeutic creams, lotions, and cosmetic products; all of the foregoing goods containing CBD solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basisACTIVE—
044Agricultural services, namely, planting, growing, fertilizing, and cultivating hemp, containing CBD for others with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 24, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 24, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 14, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance