USPTO serial 90002396
FLEXA CAPACITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEXA CAPACITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHERYL L. HOWARD
CHERYL L. HOWARD CROWELL & MORING LLPP.O. BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing electronic processing of collateralized cryptocurrency payments via a secure global computer network; collateralized cryptocurrency exchange services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |