Drawing for LAYERZ

USPTO serial 90006301

LAYERZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LAYERZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George H. Kobayashi

GEORGE H. KOBAYASHI MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELL, LTD.203 N. LASALLE STREETSUITE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029processed nuts; dried fruit; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, dried fruit and also including chocolate and/or yogurt; nut-based snack foods; nut-based spreads; nut butters; seed-based snack foods; seed butters; processed edible seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings; nut-based snack bars; seed-based snack bars; nut- and dried fruit- based snack barsACTIVE—
030confections, namely, chocolate covered nut clusters, chocolate covered fruit clusters, yogurt covered nut clusters, yogurt covered fruit clusters, chocolate and yogurt covered nut clusters, chocolate and yogurt covered fruit clusters, chocolate covered nut and fruit clusters, yogurt covered nut and fruit clusters, chocolate covered caramels, yogurt covered caramels, chocolate covered coffee beans, namely, espresso beans, yogurt covered coffee beans, namely, espresso beans, chocolate covered pretzels, yogurt covered pretzels, chocolate covered cookies, yogurt covered cookies, chocolate covered rice-based snack foods, namely, rice sticks, yogurt covered rice-based snack foods, namely, rice sticks, chocolate covered corn-based snack foods, namely, corn sticks, yogurt covered corn-based snack foods, namely, corn sticks, chocolate covered sesame sticks, yogurt covered sesame sticks; chocolate covered nuts; chocolate covered dried fruit; yogurt covered nuts; yogurt covered dried fruit; snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers and pretzels; nut flours; snack foods made from nut flours, namely, crackers, flour-based chips, bread sticks, sesame sticks, puffed cheese balls, crisps in the nature of flour based chips, wafers; processed grains; grain-based snack foods; cookies; cookies with nuts; crackers; granola-based snack barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance