USPTO serial 90007619
VALENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jalissa Bauman Horne
Jalissa Bauman Horne CopyMark Law Group LLC543 Brier St.Kenilworth, IL 60043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Adhesives for attaching artificial fingernails and/or eyelashes; After sun creams; After sun moisturisers; After-shave balms; After-shave lotions; Argan oil for cosmetic purposes; Artificial eyelashes; Bath melts; Beauty balm creams; Body crayons; Body glitter; Body sprays, namely, water in atomized containers used to produce a cooling effect; Cologne; Cosmetic body scrubs for the skin; Cosmetic facial masks; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Depilatory creams; Eye-shadow; Eyebrow pencils; Eyeliners; Eyeshadow; Eyeshadows; Face and body glitter; Face creams for cosmetic use; Face glitter; Face oils; Face-powder on paper; Facial beauty masks; Facial cleansing milk; Facial concealer; Facial cream; Facial lotion; Facial moisturizers; Facial sheet masks for cosmetic use; Facial washes; Fair complexion cream; Gauze for cosmetic purposes; Gel eye masks; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair coloring preparations; Hair conditioners for hair; Hair dressings for men; Hair dressings for women; Hair dye; Hair removing cream; Hair texturizers; Hair waving lotion; Hand scrubs; Lip neutralizers; Lip stains; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Make-up; Make-up primer; Mascara; Massage oil; Mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; Mustache wax; Nail care preparations; Nail enamel; Nail enamels; Nail hardeners; Nail strengtheners; Non-foaming cosmetic preparations for skin; Non-medicated bath preparations; Non-medicated exfoliating preparations for skin; Non-medicated mouth rinse; Non-medicated mouth wash and rinse; Non-medicated mouthwash and gargle; Non-medicated sun care preparations; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Perfume oils; Pre-shave gels; Room fragrance refills for non-electric room fragrance dispensers; Sculpting gel; Shampoo-conditioners; Shaving balm; Skin abrasive preparations; Skin bronzing creams; Skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; Skin care preparations, namely, fruit acid peels for skin; Skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin softeners; SPF sun block sprays; Styling gels for hair; Styling sprays for hair; Suntanning preparations; Tissues impregnated with make-up removing preparations; Tooth whitening creams; Tooth whitening gels; Tooth whitening preparations; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations; skin moisturizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |