Drawing for DIVA

USPTO serial 90010917

DIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Personal cleansing solution, namely, a cleansing solution for a menstrual cup; disposable sanitizing wipes and cleanser for menstrual cup; reusable period pads, namely, feminine hygiene pads; medicinal tea for pain management, calm and anti-inflammatory; personal sanitizing hand lotions; personal feminine washed and hygienic lubricant; antibacterial foaming hand soaps; period underwear in the nature of menstrual underwearACTIVE—
007Steam sanitizing machines for cleaning menstrual cupsACTIVE—
011UV sanitizing apparatus for sanitizing menstrual cupsACTIVE—
035Online retail and retail store services featuring menstrual cups, sanitizing hand lotion, sanitizing foaming hand soap, steam and UV sanitizer, feminine washes and lubricants, personal cleansing solution, namely, a cleansing solution for a menstrual cup, menstrual cup wipes and cleaner, reusable period pads, medicinal tea for pain management, calm and anti-inflammatory, shaker cups, sterilized silicone cup for cleaning, period underwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2021ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance