USPTO serial 90011007
BLUE COW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRICKLAND, CODY S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUE COW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Pedro, CA
San Pedro, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAN A. SUNDBERG
JAN A. SUNDBERG AVYNO LAW P.C.6345 BALBOA BLVD., BLDG. I, SUITE 312ENCINO, CA 91316United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk; Organic Milk; Lactose-free milk; Milk beverages with high milk content; Beverages consisting principally of milk; Beverages having a milk base; Milk-based beverages containing milk concentrates, vegetable oil and added nutrients; Milk-based beverages with high milk content; Flavored milk beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a tea base; Tea extracts; flavorings of tea for beverages, other than essential oils; flavored tea-based beverages; unsweetened tea-based beverages; sweetened tea-based beverages; tea-based beverages, namely, flavored teas, unsweetened teas, sweetened teas; tea-based beverages consisting primarily of tea and also containing carbonated water; tea-based beverages containing primarily tea extracts and also containing carbonated water and lemonade | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | carbonated water and non-caffeinated tea blends consisting primarily of carbonated water flavored with tea; carbonated water and lemonade blends flavored with non-caffeinated tea extracts; carbonated water with chamomile extracts; carbonated water and lemonade blends with chamomile extracts; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with non-caffeinated tea; non-alcoholic beverages with flavored non-caffeinated tea flavor; all of the foregoing excluding any caffeinated products, energy-drink products, products providing similar functional benefits to energy drinks, and/or products marketed as having similar functional benefits to energy drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nick Tonsich
- Other trademarks owned by Nick Tonsich
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BLUE COW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |