USPTO serial 90013388
CXL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2021
- Examiner
- FOSS, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CXL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $975
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
Beaverton, OR, US
Other trademarks owned by Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
Beaverton, OR, US
Other trademarks owned by Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
Beaverton, OR, US
Other trademarks owned by Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank X. Curci
Frank X. Curci Buchalter, A Professional Corporation805 SW Broadway Suite 1500Portland, OR 97205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed material, namely, technical documents featuring voluntary technical specifications and standards for the purpose of high-speed computer processing units ("CPU") interconnection with external devices; Printed material, namely, technical documents featuring voluntary technical specifications and standards for the purpose of high-speed computer processing units ("CPU") interconnect that enables a high-speed, efficient performance between a CPU and platform enhancements and workload accelerators and other high-speed enhancements | ACTIVE | Sep 5, 2019 |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the design and development of voluntary technical specifications and standards for high-speed computer processing units ("CPU") interconnection with external devices and high-speed computer processing units ("CPU") interconnect that enables a high-speed, efficient performance between a CPU and platform enhancements and workload accelerators and other high-speed enhancements, for its members | ACTIVE | Sep 5, 2019 |
| 042 | Developing and establishing voluntary technical specifications and standards for the purpose of high-speed computer processing units ("CPU") interconnection with external devices and technical documents for the same; Developing and establishing voluntary technical specifications and standards for the purpose of high-speed computer processing units ("CPU") interconnect that enables a high-speed, efficient performance between a CPU and platform enhancements and workload accelerators and other high-speed enhancements and technical documents for the same | ACTIVE | Sep 5, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Compute Express Link Consortium, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CXL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |