Drawing for LICKITY WATER

USPTO serial 90015953

LICKITY WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LICKITY WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric L. Tanezaki

Eric L. Tanezaki STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, SUITE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011water filters; water filtration and purification units and replacement cartridges and filters therefor; filters for drinking water; water filtering units for domestic use; water filtering units for commercial use; water filtering units for industrial use; water filtering units for municipal use; under counter water filters; under sink water filters; in-line water filters; faucets and water filters attachable to faucets; countertop water filtration devices; replacement water filters for sports water bottles; refrigerator water filters; shower heads and shower water filters; water filters for hydroponic cultivation systems; water filters for commercial food service use; alkaline water filters; gravity water filters; water filtration pitchers sold empty and replacement water filters for water filtration pitchersACTIVE—
021sports water bottles sold emptyACTIVE—
032purified drinking water; flavored drinking water; drinking water containing vitamins, minerals and electrolytes; drinking water containing caffeineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance