USPTO serial 90020767
BEEBOLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUMMERY, MARY M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEEBOLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
Kevin G. Smith SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., NW, SUITE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded computer operating software; Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for assisting drivers in connection with pickup and delivery services; Downloadable computer software for the purpose of providing transportation services, namely, software for notifying third-party drivers of requests for on-demand package pick-up and delivery; downloadable computer software for the purpose of obtaining transportation services, namely, software for requesting on-demand package pick-up and delivery; downloadable computer software for scheduling appointments of transportation service dates and coordination; downloadable computer software for the purpose of sending motor vehicles, specifically, dispatching vehicles for the purpose of transporting parcels, packages, documents, and other goods; Downloadable computer software for the purpose of requesting third-party workers to provide assembly and delivery services; devices, namely, mobile phones; mobile devices, namely, mobile phones and mobile hotspot devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, specifically directing calls and SMS and notification service to other local motor vehicle drivers and delivery services within the vicinity of the caller who uses mobile phones; Telecommunications services, namely, electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing a website featuring information about transportation services and reservations for transportation services; providing a website featuring information about delivery services, reservations for delivery services, transportation, packaging and storage of goods, organizing trips and travel | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of a web-based software application for coordinating between drivers, retailers, end customers to create a streamlined delivery experience and for optimizing routes and managing drivers, and providing customer feedback; providing temporary use of direct online software that is not downloadable for coordinating transportation services in the nature of arranging for third party drivers to transport goods for merchants and to make reservations for said transportation services; providing temporary use of non-downloadable online software for scheduling assembly and delivery services for merchants and their customers and make special reservations related to those assembly and delivery services; design and development of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |