USPTO serial 90023164
ITOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne Abelman
Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Guard rails of metal; metal railings; grab bars of metal for buses; bars for metal railings; metal poles; sheet metal; plates of metal used to hold objects for disinfectant purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Doors for buses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorships in the field of guard rails of metal, metal railings, grab bars of metal for buses, bars for metal railings, metal poles, sheet metal and plates of metal used to hold objects for disinfectant purposes; distributorships in the field of bus parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Metal fabrication and finishing services for others; metalworking; custom manufacturing of furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENTREPRISES ALLIÉES LTÉE
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ITOUCH
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |