USPTO serial 90024310
LUNARLOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUNARLOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Toilet seats; Toilet trainer seats, namely, smaller training seats for attachment to full-size toilets and toilet seats for training purposes; Aeroponic grow cabinet in the nature of a closed environment with lights, exhaust system, aeroponic misting chamber and automated control system; Air purifying apparatus; Air sterilisers; Arm rests for use with toilet seats; Bathroom exhaust fans; Bioreactor for use in the treatment of organic waste; Dryers used for the removal of solid, liquid and vapor contaminants from compressed air and gases; Drying apparatus for use in heating, ventilation systems, air conditioning systems and refrigeration systems; Electric air sanitizing unit; Flexible pipes being parts of shower plumbing installations; Flexible pipes being parts of sink plumbing installations; Flushometers; Hot water heaters; LED underwater lights; Lighting fixtures with motion detection; Marine sewage holding tank vent filters; Multiple position bath seats; Plumbing fixtures, namely, sink sprayers; Sanitizing apparatus for linens using ultraviolet light, ozone sterilization and low pressure techniques; Separators for the cleaning and purification of air; Separators for the cleaning and purification of gases; Sewage disposal plants; Sewage purification installations; Sewage treatment plants; Showers; Solar energy based cooling apparatus; Solar-powered cooling units; Sustainable onsite water recycling and wastewater treatment systems; Toilet accessories, namely, plastic handles that are affixed to toilet seats; Toilet bowls; Toilets; Ventilating louvers; Waste disposal incinerators; Waste water purification units; Water closets; Water distilling units | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1972 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |