Drawing for ISYMFS

USPTO serial 90024751

ISYMFS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, TARYN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ISYMFS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet Martin, Attorney

Janet Martin, Attorney LAW OFFICE OF JANET MARTIN25108 MARGUERITE #A334MISSION VIEJO, CA 92692UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and video recordings featuring music and artistic performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2023MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 4, 2023MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 4, 2023ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jan 12, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2022RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Oct 31, 2022RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2022RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 26, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2022CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2022CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 28, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 3, 2021IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 3, 2021EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 1, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 30, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 30, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 13, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance