USPTO serial 90030765
FELIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FELIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Melanson
Lisa M. Melanson McCarthy Tétrault LLP745 Thurlow Streetc/o Suite 2400Vancouver, BC, V6E0C5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for ecommerce transactions, namely, e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; downloadable computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; Electronic software updates, namely, downloadable computer software for updating computer software and associated downloadable data files for updating computer software in the field of e-commerce and consumer transactions, provided via computer and communication networks; downloadable software libraries, namely, downloadable software for use in database management for use by e-commerce business; downloadable computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer being transfer of payment via a global computer network; Electronic funds transfer; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, credit card, debit card, prepaid cards, electronic cheque and electronic payments; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, credit card, debit card, prepaid cards, electronic cheque and electronic payments facilitated by cloud-based payment terminals; electronic payment services involving electronic processing and subsequent transmission of bill payment data; Providing an on-line computer database in the field of finance, namely, ecommerce transactions; Financial analysis; financial evaluations for e-commerce purposes; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing user authentication services using personal identification number technology and biometric hardware and software technology for e-commerce transactions; User authentication services using technology for e-commerce transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |