USPTO serial 90031251
BERTHALINENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHEATLEY, TRAVIS DWIGHT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BERTHALINENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bed sheets; Bed spreads; Bedsheets; Bedspreads; Blanket throws; Comforters; Cotton fabric; Duvet covers; Duvets; Eiderdowns; Fitted bed sheets; Flat bed sheets; Pillow cases; Pillow covers; Pillow shams; Pillowcases; Quilt covers; Shams; Sheet sets; Table linen; Textile tablecloths | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| Mar 14, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |