Drawing for CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.

USPTO serial 90033398

CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CODE CONSULTANTS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan P. Soifer

JONATHAN P. SOIFER SANDBERG PHOENIX & VON GONTARD P.C.120 S. CENTRAL AVENUESUITE 1600CLAYTON, MO 63105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Consulting services in the field of building accessibility and compliance with ADA and FHA guidelines; Inspection services for the purpose of determining accessibility of a building, structure or site to disabled individuals and for compliance with ADA and FHA guidelinesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
042Technical consultation in the field of Information and communications technology (ICT) and low voltage systems, namely, Consulting, inspection, review, analysis and designing services of Information and communications technology (ICT) and low voltage systems; Computer modeling servicesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
045Fire protection and life safety regulations consulting services, namely, Consulting services regarding building and fire codes, Analysis and testing of smoke control systems, Assessment and review of Statement of Conditions (SOC) for health care facilities, Safety consulting services in the fields of hazard assessments and abatement procedures, Construction inspection services; Consulting, inspection, review, analysis and design services in the field of fire suppression systems, fire alarm systems, and mass notification systems; Expert witness services in legal matters in the field of fire protection and building safety, accessibility and compliance with ADA and FHA guidelines, fire suppression systems, fire alarm and mass notification systems, and ICT and low voltage systems; Litigation support servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2020GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Oct 16, 2020CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance