USPTO serial 90033516
DIG811
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONEGAN, DANIEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIG811?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Tietsworth
Steven C. Tietsworth SEESCAN, INC.3855 RUFFIN ROADSAN DIEGO, CA 92123United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable application software for enabling construction personnel and others to make requests for the location of buried pipes, cables, and other underground utilities prior to excavating construction sites, the requests being transmitted via smart phones or other portable computing devices that can capture terrestrial images; downloadable application software for generating maps of buried pipes, cables, and other underground utilities; downloadable application software for identifying the location of buried pipes, cables, and other underground utilities prior to excavation; buried utility locators, namely, portable and vehicular mounted electronic devices for receiving magnetic field signals emitted from the utilities and determining information about hidden or buried pipes, cables, or conduit; buried utility locators, namely, portable and vehicular mounted electronic devices for receiving magnetic field signals emitted from the utilities, receiving RFID tag information emitted from RFID tags, and for generating information about the utilities based on the received magnetic field signals and RFID tag signals; buried utility locator transmitters, namely, electronic transmitters for generating current signals that couple directly, inductively, or capacitively to hidden or buried pipes, cables, or conduits, and for generating magnetic fields for detection by electronic buried utility locator devices; electronic beacon devices in the nature of sondes used for generating magnetic field signals for sensing by electronic buried utility locator devices; RFID devices in the nature of RFID tags and readers for use with buried utility locators; downloadable software for use with pipe inspection cameras, namely, software for generating maps showing pipe location or pipe inspection information; downloadable software for use with buried utility locators, namely, software for generating mapping information associated with hidden or buried utilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |