USPTO serial 90033875
HELIOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, OLIVIA SUNMIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELIOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie L. Kiedrowski
Carrie L. Kiedrowski Jones Day250 Vesey StreetNew York, NY 10281-1047United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE AND IN-PERSON CLASSES AND WORKSHOPS, AND NON-DOWNLOADABLE WEBINARS AND ONLINE INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS VIA A VIDEO-ON-DEMAND SERVICE, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF DATA MANAGEMENT, DATA STORAGE, DATA BACKUP AND RECOVERY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE, COMPUTER SYSTEMS, ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY, CLOUD COMPUTING, COMPUTER SECURITY AND DISASTER RECOVERY; ONLINE JOURNALS, NAMELY, BLOGS ON THE SUBJECTS OF DATA MANAGEMENT, DATA STORAGE, DATA BACKUP AND RECOVERY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE, COMPUTER SYSTEMS, ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY, CLOUD COMPUTING, COMPUTER SECURITY AND DISASTER RECOVERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY, INFRASTRUCTURE-AS-A-SERVICE (IAAS) CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY, SOFTWARE-AS-A-SERVICE (SAAS) CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY, AND PLATFORM-AS-A-SERVICE (PAAS) CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, HELP DESK SERVICES, NAMELY, INCLUDING REMOTE HELP DESK SERVICES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, REMOTE AND ONSITE INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR MONITORING, ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CLOUD COMPUTING IT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS; REMOTE AND ON-SITE COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANCY SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF DATA PROTECTION, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CLOUD HOSTING PROVIDER SERVICES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS; CUSTOMIZING COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, INTEGRATION OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS ON A SUBSCRIPTION OR PAY-PER-USE BASIS; PLATFORM-AS-A-SERVICE (PAAS) FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE PLATFORMS BEING COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2025 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |