Drawing for MUSIC ENHANCED BY SHARED HEADPHONES

USPTO serial 90037945

MUSIC ENHANCED BY SHARED HEADPHONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSIC ENHANCED BY SHARED HEADPHONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sevag Demirjian

Sevag Demirjian Foundation Law Group LLP4605 Lankershim Blvd., Suite 650North Hollywood, CA 91602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Headphones; earbuds; wireless speakers; cellular phones; recorded software for selecting of sound frequencies, sound source directions and amplification and attenuation thereof; recorded computer operating programs; downloadable computer programs for selecting of sound frequencies and sound source directions and amplification and attenuation thereof; wired and wireless communication protocol products and devices, namely, devices for the transmission and receiving of voice, data and video streams across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; computer and data networking products and devices, namely, computer network hubs and switches; radio signal relay products and devices in the nature of receivers and transmitters of digital media and audio signals; amplification products and devices in the nature of amplifiers; transmission products and devices, namely, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 10, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 10, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 10, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 27, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2020GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2020GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 19, 2020CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 13, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance