USPTO serial 90039100
ROBOTANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBOTANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew P. Frederick
Matthew P. Frederick REED SMITH LLP1717 ARCH STREET, THREE LOGAN SQUARESUITE 3100PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automated robotic farming machines, namely, autonomous machines for harvesting fruits and vegetables, autonomous machines for picking fruits and vegetables; autonomous retrieval machines for retrieving trays of plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer hardware for use in programming and operating automated robotic farming systems; computer hardware for use in programming and operating monitoring systems in automated robotic farming systems; computer hardware for use in programming, operating, and measuring the production of automated robotic farming systems and the production of plants in such systems and/or performing analytics on collected data; all of the foregoing for use in automated farming systems comprised of automated robotic farming machines, namely, autonomous harvesting machines, autonomous picking machines, autonomous retrieval machines for retrieving trays of plants, and/or autonomous measurement machines for measuring growth conditions for plants and machine conditions for automated robotic farming machines; computer hardware for use in programming and operating automated robotic farming systems; autonomous measurement devices for measuring growth conditions of plants and for monitoring and tracking autonomous farming machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Aeroponic growing systems comprised of robot manipulated grow beds, plant grow lights, grow racks in the nature of closed environments with integrated misting chambers, exhaust system, manipulated grow trays, and automated robotic controls therefor; Growing system for plants comprised of racks for growing plants that feature automatic controls for moving and watering the plants, automated sensors for detecting growth conditions, automated devices for growing plants, namely, automated robotic farming machines, namely, autonomous harvesting machines, autonomous picking machines, autonomous retrieval machines for retrieving trays of plants, and/or autonomous measurement machines for measuring growth conditions for plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer technology consultation in the field of automated robotic farming systems featuring data analytics consulting and support; installation and maintenance of computer software for automated robotic farming systems; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use in programming and operating automated robotic farming systems; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use in programming and operating monitoring systems in automated robotic farming systems; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use in programming, operating, and measuring the production of automated robotic farming systems and the production of plants in such systems and/or performing analytics on collected data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RoBotany Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by RoBotany Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROBOTANY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |