USPTO serial 90044398
4TWENTYWELLNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 4TWENTYWELLNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mableton, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROSEZENA J. PIERCE
ROSEZENA J. PIERCE R.J. PIERCE LAW GROUP, PC200 W. MADISONSUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplement drink mixes; Dietary supplemental drinks; Dietary supplemental drinks in the nature of vitamin and mineral beverages; Dietary supplements; Dietary supplements for human consumption; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements for human consumption; Dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in liquid and dry mix form for therapeutic purposes; Dietary food supplements; Herbal supplements; Herbal supplements for human consumption; Vitamin drops; Vitamin preparations; Vitamin supplements; Vitamin tablets; Dietary supplement beverage for human consumption; Herbal tinctures for medical purposes; Liquid herbal supplements; Liquid vitamin supplements; Medicinal oils; Natural dietary supplements; Natural herbal supplements; Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix; Preparation for the relief of pain; Vitamin oils for human consumption; Vitamin supplement in tablet form for use in making an effervescent beverage when added to water; none of the foregoing containing or derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis or containing CBD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |