USPTO serial 90047534
SKIPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURAND, MEGAN LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKIPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FORT WORTH, TX
FORT WORTH, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J. Day DAY LAW FIRM9977 NORTH 90TH STREET, SUITE 155SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in educational course and curriculum management, record keeping, family organizer, project management, tracking teaching and learning progress, online communication between teachers, academic researchers, and students, tracking student progress, and for facilitating and conducting online connections, collaborations, and interactive discussions between classroom students; Software as a service featuring software for use in educational course and curriculum management, record keeping, family organizer, project management, tracking teaching and learning progress, online communication between teachers, academic researchers, and students, tracking student progress, and for facilitating and conducting online connections, collaborations, and interactive discussions between classroom students | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |