USPTO serial 90047806
UANDME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, RAYMOND KANGMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UANDME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hanchuan, Hubei, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mudi Han
124 LAKE FOREST DRIVERICHMOND HEIGHTS, MO 63117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Dishware; Drinkware; Pans; Collapsible storage containers for domestic use; Containers for household or kitchen use; Cooking pots; Crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; Drinking cups for babies and children; Egg separators, non electric, for household purposes; Fruit presses, non-electric, for household purposes; Garlic presses; Hand-operated atomizer for household use; Hand-operated food grinders; Heaters for feeding bottles, non-electric; Knife rests; Non-electric coffee makers; Non-electric ice crushers; Non-electric juicers; Pastry molds; Portable cooking kits for outdoor use; Pot and pan scrapers; Scoops for household purposes; Vegetable mashers; Whisks, non-electric, for household purposes; Wood chopping boards for kitchen use | ACTIVE | Jun 7, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |