USPTO serial 90056570
GLIDE HEALTH PASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLIDE HEALTH PASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FLORIANA FRN, MT
DUBLIN, IE
DUBLIN, IE
Fairfax, VA
Fairfax, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin McDermott
Kevin McDermott DAON, INC.4097 MONUMENT CORNER DRIVESUITE 550FAIRFAX, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded computer software for biometric verification purposes; and Downloadable and recorded computer software for biometric identification purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing automated check-in and ticketing services for air travelers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Identification verification services in the nature of providing user authentication services using biometric hardware and software technology, block chain technology, pass-phrase technology, cryptographic based protocols, or single sign-on technology for in-person and electronic transactions, and for ingress and egress at secure public or private facilities such as airports, sports arenas, and educational facilities, other public or private secure access venues or events, and secure facilities within or at such facilities, venues and events; Identification verification services in the nature of providing user authentication services using biometric hardware and software technology, block chain technology, pass-phrase technology, cryptographic based protocols, or single sign-on technology for in-person and electronic transactions, and for ingress and egress at secure public or private facilities such as airports, sports arenas, and educational facilities, other public or private secure access venues or events, and secure facilities, such as lounges, within or at such facilities, venues and events; Provision of secure server and mobile device technology services for certifying the health and wellness of an individual; Authentication technology services, namely, providing secure server and mobile device technology services using biometric features stored on a computer network to validate identities | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Airline passenger security screening services; Security screening services, namely, verifying the identity credentials of enrolled members for public safety and security purposes; Identification verification services, namely, verification of identity credentials of enrolled members for public safety and security purposes; Security screening services, namely, verifying identities of enrolled members for public safety and security purposes; Identification verification services, namely, verification of the identity of enrolled member for public safety and security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAON ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DAON TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks owned by DAON TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks owned by DAON HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DAON HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named GLIDE HEALTH PASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 8, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |