Drawing for DIGITAL KITCHEN

USPTO serial 90057598

DIGITAL KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, MARISSA SHARPE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT S. HAVLICK

SCOTT S. HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and deliveryACTIVEJul 16, 2020
043Take out restaurant servicesACTIVEJul 16, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2024MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2024ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 20, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 12, 2023RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 20, 2023GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2023GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2023CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 8, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 17, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 17, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 16, 2022GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 16, 2022GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 16, 2022CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 4, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance