USPTO serial 90058010
RED WOLVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED WOLVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel B. Swerdlin
Daniel B. Swerdlin ALL BRIDGES LEGAL, P.C.1388 HAIGHT STREET #58SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail storefront services, featuring bedding products, pillow cases, pillows, beverage containers and receptacles, drinking vessels, water bottles, mugs, backpacks, bags, tote bags, fanny packs, face masks, protective facewear, neck gaiters, towels, posters, bean bag chairs, laptop sleeves, device cases, clothing, t-shirts, hoodies, sweatshirts, men's underwear, sports bras, pants, sweatpants, stickers, earrings, necklaces, bracelets, jewelry, socks, footwear, sandals, swimwear, leggings, shorts, tanktops, long-sleeve shirts, and jackets | ACTIVE | Jul 17, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |