USPTO serial 90060221
FORMULARYHUB.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORMULARYHUB.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Parsippany, NJ, US
East Parsippany, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAYSON M MACYDA
JAYSON M MACYDA GENERAL COUNSEL FOR AGADIA SYSTEMS INC.P O BOX 87491CANTON, MI 48187United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software design and development; Computer software design; Customizing computer software; Developing computer software | ACTIVE | May 9, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 26, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | GSS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | GSSF | SU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | SSFR | SOU - SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 24, 2024 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2023 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2022 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 3, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |