USPTO serial 90065336
ELITE BANDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELITE BANDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Providence, RI
Providence, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH J PECKHAM
DEBORAH J PECKHAM BARCLAY DAMON LLP160 FEDERAL STREET, 10TH FLOORBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective clothing, namely, pants and shorts incorporating viscous or foamed polymer conforming pads; protective clothing, namely, clothing for protection against accident or injury incorporating viscous or foamed polymer conforming pads | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Compression garments incorporating conforming foam protective pads, in the nature of athletic shorts | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, athletic shorts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2025 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |