USPTO serial 90065703
PILLTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RATCLIFFE, ROBERT L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PILLTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward K Welch II
IP&L SOLUTIONS2335 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 307NAPLES, FL 34103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabric finish or surface treatment composition sold as a component of finished treated or coated textiles and fabrics to impart or improve tensile strength, abrasion resistance, tear strength, resiliency, elastic memory, pill resistance, and/or rub resistance; fabric finish or surface treatment composition sold as a component of bedding, window treatments, towels, table coverings, table napkins of textiles, unfitted fabric furniture coverings, and curtains to impart or improve tensile strength, abrasion resistance, tear strength, resiliency, elastic memory, pill resistance, and/or rub resistance to the fabric | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Fabric finish or surface treatment composition sold as a component of clothing, headwear, and footwear to impart or improve tensile strength, abrasion resistance, tear strength, resiliency, elastic memory, pill resistance, and/or rub resistance to the fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |