Drawing for CONDEVO

USPTO serial 90067598

CONDEVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONDEVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George Pavlik

GEORGE PAVLIK HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP120 SOUTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, SUITE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Heating installations, heating boilers, heating elements and structural parts therefor, heat cells sold as an integral part of condensing boilers; gas-water copper heat exchangers not being parts of machines; water-water stainless steel heat exchangers not being parts of machines; heat exchanger used for gas water heaters not being parts of machines, stainless steel plate heat exchangers not being parts of machines, thermostatic brass valves for heating installationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 2, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 29, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 29, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 11, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 20, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Aug 19, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 25, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance