CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SLANTBACK

USPTO serial 90069248

SLANTBACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOLD, BARBARA NIELSEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLANTBACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PHILIP R. WARN

PHILIP R. WARN WARN PARTNERS, P.C.691 NORTH SQUIRREL ROADSUITE 140AUBURN HILLS, MI 48326

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Soft tops for sport utility vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 21, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 20, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 20, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 4, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 26, 2022RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 17, 2022GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2022GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2022CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 18, 2022AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2022IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 6, 2022AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 6, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 5, 2022EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 29, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 25, 2022PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Mar 24, 2022APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 7, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 15, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance