USPTO serial 90072796
GABL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GABL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Solana Beach, CA
Solana Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Heisey
David E. Heisey SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP12275 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for providing good Samaritans with information about individuals in need of help, providing individuals in need with information about good Samaritans willing to perform good deeds, and connecting good Samaritans with individuals in need through referrals; downloadable mobile applications for providing a marketplace for connecting individuals in need with good Samaritans individuals performing good deeds; downloadable mobile applications enabling individuals receiving help to award points and provide feedback for the help they received from good Samaritans | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing a website featuring news and information in the field of promoting the public awareness of good deeds for others; Promoting public awareness of the performance of and need for good deeds and acts of kindness, and making a positive difference in individuals' lives and in the community; promoting awareness of kindness in others through the administration of a points-based awards system, namely, awarding points to users for good deeds and actions, subtracting points from users for bad deeds and actions, enabling users to decide as to whether a deed or action deserves the awarding or the subtraction of points, tracking and publishing the point totals of individual users, and enabling users to use points to redeem favors and other consideration; promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website where users exchange accrued points in a online points system based on karmic good deeds for the cash value of their points and receive consumer goods and services from participating vendors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |