USPTO serial 90078297
DURADUCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURADUCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vaughan, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Berger
Jonathan Berger LEVISOHN BERGER LLP11 Broadway, Suite 615NEW YORK, NY 10004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Ducts, namely, metal ducts for ventilation installations, metal ducts for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning for fire-rated ventilation systems, metal ducts for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning for blast-resistant installations, and metal ducts for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning for ballistic-resistant installations; walls, namely, metal fire-resistant walls; enclosures, namely, metal fire-resistant enclosures composed of metal panels; Ducts made of metallic materials, namely, galvanized metals, stainless steel metals, or specialty metals, for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Ducts for electric cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Ducts made of non-metallic materials, namely, non-combustible materials and fiber cement core materials, for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning; Ducts, namely, non-metal ducts for ventilation installations, non-metal ducts for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning for fire-rated ventilation systems, non-metal ducts for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning for blast-resistant installations, and non-metal ducts for ventilation, heating, air-conditioning for ballistic-resistant installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 18, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |