USPTO serial 90078942
ENABLING RESPONSIBLE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMA, GABRIELLE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENABLING RESPONSIBLE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARK CITY, UT, US
Park City, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Hackmann
Peter Hackmann Sinorica LLC dba Thoughts to Paper20251 Century Blvd Ste 140Germantown, MD 20874United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Consulting in the field of information technology; Software development consulting in the field of enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Software development consulting in the field of facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Software development and product development consulting in the field of enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Software development and product development consulting in the field of facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Technological consultation in the technology field of facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Technological consultation in the technology field of enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Technology consultation and research in the field of enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Technology consultation and research in the field of facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Technology consultation in the field of enabling and consulting for data science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, fairness, ethics, transparency, mitigation of bias, explainability, digital and technology responsibility; Technology consultation in the field of facilitating audit, oversight, governance, risk, and compliance; Telecommunications technology consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |