Drawing for NUCRANI

USPTO serial 90087905

NUCRANI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUCRANI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KUMIKO IDE

Kumiko Ide Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1025 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in neurosurgery and craniomaxillofacial surgeryACTIVEMay 1, 2021

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 3, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2022EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Sep 30, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 26, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 25, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2022CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 24, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2022CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2021CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2021SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 14, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2021IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 5, 2021EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 23, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance