Drawing for SONOMONO

USPTO serial 90088766

SONOMONO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KETCHUM, BRENDAN J
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONOMONO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D. Bianco, PhD

Paul D. Bianco, PhD FLEIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW21355 EAST DIXIE HIGHWAYSUITE 115MIAMI, FL 33180

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Freeze-dried natto powder; Freeze-dried natto powder in vegetable capsulesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 2022CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 9, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 24, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 29, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2021FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
May 21, 2021ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 17, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2020GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2020GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2020EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Dec 2, 2020CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance